If you are in distress, you can text 988 at any time. If it is an emergency, call 9-1-1 or go to your local emergency department.

Home › Resources › Structural Stigma in Health Care for Mental Health and Substance Use – Networking for the Design, Development, and Implementation of an Audit Tool

Structural Stigma in Health Care for Mental Health and Substance Use – Networking for the Design, Development, and Implementation of an Audit Tool

From October 1, 2019 to March 19, 2020, the Mental Health Commission of Canada’s (MHCC’s) structural stigma research team explored the idea of developing an audit tool for mental health and substance use (MHSU).

Our initial strategy evolved by reframing and contextualizing stigma within the health-care system’s quality-of-care framework, specifically under the “E” pillar of equity. Establishing stigma as a quality-of care problem within existing monitoring and delivery processes requires new ways of thinking and the creation of a quality audit tool.

The research group set out to conduct a range of networking activities to identify promising partners for the design, development, and implementation of a structural stigma audit tool. The process involved inquiring, networking, and developing relationships with potential partners, key system influencers, and decision makers. We contacted 13 agencies across a small sampling of the health regulatory and performance measurement field, locally, provincially, nationally, and (more selectively) internationally. With Nivatha Moothathamby having made the appropriate arrangements, Thomas Ungar interviewed each agency in person or by tele- or web conference. Stephanie Knaak also attended two of the meetings. Due to availability problems and a time zone difference, we collected information from one contact by email.

Synthesis of the results

  1. Tools and measures: none currently in use.
    No agency is using or knows of any specific tool or measure to target structural stigma or mental health equity, although some groups have a mandate to develop and track quality in mental health care.
    Others have been developing mental health quality indicators that are somewhat related. These indicators may be grouped as follows:
    • Cultural or organizational audit ꟷ Accreditation Canada has an in-depth list of criteria that peer reviewers can use when visiting an organization, some of which are ranked by importance, including required organizational practices (ROPs).
    • Performance measurement ꟷ A quality dashboard or indicator that includes “restraint use” but little else specific to mental health. Ontario is looking at measuring adherence to quality-based
      procedures for three diagnoses.
    • Equity measurement ꟷ Some organizations (e.g., CIHI, IHI) conceptualize gender, and socioeconomic items as “stratifiers” for other outcome measures related to inequities or accommodations for persons with a “disability” (in keeping with, e.g., the Ontarians with Disabilities Act).
    • Legal ꟷ The U.K. has a parity law for its Mental Health Act, and the U.S. has a Mental Health Parity Act. These laws enshrine the principle of parity for mental health care. In Canada, CMHA National
      has recently been calling for the same.
  2. Key gaps in metrics and monitoring
    • Funding of mental health services as a percentage of global health budgets in developed countries ꟷ the seven to nine per cent gap (much lower percentage in developing countries)
    • Patient/client perceptions of care
    • Policy and legislation gap in addressing structural inequity, parity, and quality rights
    • The hidden, implicit, or noticeable absence of indicators (see potential indicators on page 3)
    • Institutional external review or process and oversight monitoring gaps ꟷ minimal items for assessing structural stigma (e.g., ROPs)
    • Narrative as a strategy for transformative learning and awareness and education on structural stigma for leaders.

Feedback Form

Hey, thanks for checking out this resource. After you’ve seen it, we’d love to learn a bit more about your interests and how you found us. Was the information what you looking for? Was it helpful? We’ll use any feedback you provide to further improve what we do.

Are you willing to be contacted within 3 to 6 months for a short follow-up survey?
In case of “Yes” – please provide an email address
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

SHARE THIS PAGE

RELATED

Mental health affects everyone, including health-care workers. This video tells the story of an individual who finds access to quality mental health care services — but only after an overwhelming...

Hear from health-care experts offering their insights on the stigma-free and inclusive dimension of the Quality Mental Health Care Framework, focusing on the crucial concept of structural stigma. Our expert...

The mental health and substance use health (MHSUH) impacts of COVID-19 and the overdose crisis have increased the gap between what the population needs and what the service system can...